|
To test some of the ideas
on the previous page:
A single vertical vane was
made from paper card.
|
|
|
This produced a
spike on both sides of the star.
Theory
correct so far... |
|
A double vane was
made.
|
|
|
The animation
shows two spikes moving across the star, as predicted. |
|
I was
interested in what a single series of slits would produce.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A 30 second exposure with the
Sigma 500mm lens |
|
|
|
|
This is a 0.25 second exposure
to show more detail near the centre |
|
|
|
|
There
is clearly some colour shift. Blue is displaced above the central line,
red is below. This is most probably due to chromatic aberration in the lens
(although it is supposedly an 'apochromatic' lens).
|
|
|
This is a single series of
slits with the reflecting telescope that should have zero chromatic
aberration. Note that there is still a small amount of displacement of red and
blue, but it is not symmetrical about the centre. |
|
|
|
On march 9th I
was contacted by Ferry Zijp (from Nuenen, The Netherlands) who has been doing
work on the Bahtinov Mask. This is a superb animation he has
made.
The simulation
is for a D8" , f/4.4 Newtonian and monochromatic light at lambda=550 nm.
It covers the
defocus range from -250 micrometer to +250 micrometer in steps of 25
micrometer.
The
intensity plots are "clipped" in order to show the small intensities in the
high diffraction orders
|
|
|
Is 40 degrees the best angle between slits?
|
The standard
Bahtinov mask has slits at an angle of 40 degrees to each
other.
This image is
using an experimental mask with slits at only 10 degrees.
Is it now easier to judge when the
central spike bisects the angled spikes?
|
|
|
|
A new mask - the 'Carey
Mask'
Even more
mask variants!
|